Features that exist to be listed, not used
Some capabilities are built to appear on a page rather than to be operated.
There is a kind of feature whose main function is to occupy a line in a comparison. It is real, it works, and almost nobody switches it on twice. Features like that exist because lists are how products are compared, and a longer list reads as more generous. The cost is not only the money. Additional capability adds menus, settings, parts that can fail, and instructions you will never finish reading, and it can make the ordinary daily use of the thing slightly worse in exchange for a capability you use once.
Test each listed feature with a simple question: can I describe the specific moment I would use this? If the answer is a shrug or a vague someday, the feature should count for nothing in your decision, even if it is genuinely impressive. Conversely, a product with a short list that does the one thing you need extremely well is often the better purchase, and it will lose every side-by-side comparison table because tables reward quantity. Simply knowing that is usually enough to stop the table from deciding for you.
It also helps to notice which features you already own and do not use. Most households contain several devices with capabilities nobody has ever touched. That history is your own data, freely available, and far more predictive than a description written to be attractive. If the last three purchases in a category came with capabilities you ignored, you can safely assume the next one will too, and buy accordingly. Nobody becomes a different sort of owner because a page listed a longer set of capabilities, and the money saved by admitting that can go towards the parts of the item you will touch every day.